Let's extend a maritime metaphor --"surfing the internet" -- to the interesting and useful treasures that you may find floating about online.
Jetsam is the good stuff that someone deliberately abandoned. Anyone who finds it, can monetize it.
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/flotsam-jetsam.html
Flotsam, on the other hand, is good stuff that floated out of the custody of its owner by accident or mishap. The owner did not intend for it to be released into the wild, and the original owner retains rights to it.
If marine law has a term for stuff that pirates filch and dangle in the deep for bait to entice and entangle treasure hunters, this writer is not aware of it.
Legal blogger Terri Seligman, writing "The Real Deal: Using Found Content" for the prestigious law firm Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC (which represents some of the world's best known celebrities and creative content creators, publishers, and providers) explains that all that glitters online is not necessarily yours to take.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=98c3332b-418c-4f19-b4ec-f94f5c11339b&utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&utm_medium=html+email+-+body+-+general+section&utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2018-08-03&utm_term=
Check out and memorize Terri Seligman's eight easy rules to follow before you use for commercial purposes that amazingly real and authentic photograph that you "found" online.
If you should be wary about using a photograph taken by someone else, and also a photo of someone else, and also of a photo that includes any artwork (or graffiti) in the background, you should also be careful about re-using old school yearbooks.
Angela Hoy explains:
https://writersweekly.com/ask-the-expert/can-i-use-old-yearbook-photos-in-my-book-or-online
For our Australian friends, (and authors doing business in Australia) legal bloggers Gordon Hughes and Andrew Sutherland, writing for Australia's leading intellectual property legal practice Davies Collison Cave
give advice based on that card game at which Han Solo excelled.
See "App Developers Turn To The Dark Side."
Just because a copyright owner does not notice someone else's copyright infringement (perhaps a meme .gif) or even ignores one copyright infringing use by someone else.... does not mean that the copyright owner forfeits their copyright and their right to sue another copyright infringer.
Podcasters also need to be careful, in this case, about the music clip they found online and may want to use.
Legal blogger David Oxenford, writing for the law firm Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP has a series of articles on podcasting, and the pitfalls of podcasting without knowing who owns what.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=dd85dd95-dbbf-416d-b965-0fef55c13d36&utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&utm_medium=HTML+email&utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2018-08-08&utm_term=
Yes, one has to pay the piper!
All the best,
Rowena Cherry
Saturday, August 11, 2018
Thursday, August 09, 2018
Defining Deviancy
In sociological discourse, we encounter the term "defining deviancy down." This phrase refers to behavior that used to be condemned but now is tolerated. It's an academic way of grumbling, "Society is going to the dogs." Profanity and obscenity in what used to be called "mixed company," for example. Open sale of sexually explicit literature. "Four-letter-words," extreme gore, and onscreen sex in movies. Going to houses of worship or expensive restaurants without wearing a coat and tie or a dress (as appropriate). (In my childhood, it was frowned upon for a girl or woman to shop at an upscale department story without dressing up.) For boys, wearing a T-shirt to school (the crisis in one episode of LEAVE IT TO BEAVER centered around this transgression); for girls, going to school in pants instead of skirts. Individuals of opposite sexes living together outside of marriage. Unmarried women becoming pregnant and having babies openly instead of hiding their condition in shame. Ubiquitous gun violence in the inner cities—in WEST SIDE STORY, the introduction of a gun into the feud between the rival gangs was framed as a shocking escalation of the conflict.
In many respects, however, we've defined "deviancy" upward since what some people nostalgically recall as the good old days of the 1950s. Smoking, for example. In my childhood, most adults smoked cigarettes, and they did it anytime almost everywhere. In grocery stores! At the doctor's office! Air pollution by big-engined, gas-guzzling cars that used to be status symbols is now disapproved of. So are the racial slurs often heard in casual conversation back then. Dogs nowadays don't run loose in our communities like Lassie and Lady (my main sources of information on dogs until my parents acquired one, who didn't act nearly so intelligent as Lady, the Tramp, and their friends). Leash laws didn't become widespread until my teens. Alleged humor based on physical abuse of women by men used to be common in the media. Ralph on THE HONEYMOONERS regularly threatened to hit his wife ("to the moon, Alice!"), though he never did so on screen, and in THE QUIET MAN, John Wayne spanked Maureen O'Hara in the middle of the road. Public intoxication, including drunk driving, was also casually treated as funny, as in many of P. G. Wodehouse's Jeeves stories and the novels of Thorne Smith (author of TOPPER). Most adults seemed to regard bullying as a commonplace childhood rite of passage that kids had to learn to cope with, as long as it didn't cause significant injury. As far as safety features such as seat belts in cars were concerned, there was no law requiring passengers to wear them, because they didn't exist.
Where some societal changes are concerned, factions differ on whether they constitute improvement or deterioration. Some contemporary parents wouldn't think of letting their children visit friends, roam around the neighborhood, or ride a bus on their own at ages that were considered perfectly normal until recent decades. Conversely, if adults from the 1950s could witness today's trends, most of them would probably consider "helicopter parenting" harmful as well as ridiculous. Are the emergence of same-sex marriage, dual-career households, and legal access to abortion good or bad changes? The answer to that question depends on one's political philosophy. Does a decline in church and synagogue membership mean we've become a society of secularists and atheists, or does it simply mean that, because we no longer have so much social pressure to look "religious," for the most part only sincere believers join religious organizations? (C. S. Lewis noted that an alleged "decline" in chapel attendance among university students in fact reflected a sudden drop as soon as attendance became optional instead of compulsory.)
Whether you think current trends in behavior, customs, and morals are mainly positive or negative probably influences whether you believe Steven Pinker, for instance, is right or wrong when he claims in ENLIGHTENMENT NOW that we're living in the best of times rather than the worst.
Margaret L. Carter
Carter's CryptTuesday, August 07, 2018
Soul Mates And The HEA Real or Fantasy Part 2
Soul Mates And The HEA Real or Fantasy
Part 2
by
Jacqueline Lichtenberg
Part One of this series on the plausibility of the HEA and Soul Mate premises of Romance novels is:
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2016/03/soul-mates-and-hea-real-or-fantasy-part.html
We have discussed the plausibility of the Soul Mate hypothesis and the Happily Ever After goal hypothesis in many different contexts. Here are some:
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2016/06/theme-worldbuilding-integration-part-14.html
If the HEA is implausible, how come it happens?
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2015/01/if-hea-is-implausible-how-come-it.html
The Cheating Woman
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2013/03/happily-ever-after-life-patterns-part-2.html
Nesting Huge Themes Inside Each Other (building the foundation of a series)
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2011/10/believing-in-happily-ever-after-part-4.html
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2016/11/index-to-believing-in-happily-ever-after.html
And What Does She See In Him?
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-does-she-see-in-him.html
So all of this gets very abstract for the writer, while necessarily very concrete and visual for the Reader.
To find a book to be a "page-turner" or immersive or just a whopping good read, the reader has to be able to sense a congruence between their everyday life and the implausible, whacky, zany or soapy life of the Characters.
So the writer must translate a world view the writer just makes up into a story the reader can recognize in real life.
The Soul Mate and HEA hypotheses fail with certain readers because the writer failed to translate the writer's "Love Conquers All" assumptions into a language (symbolism) the reader can recognize.
People don't reject the Romance Genre because they don't believe in Romance. They reject the Romance genre because the writers assume the readers share the premise.
That is one difference between Romance and Science Fiction.
In science fiction or fantasy genres, the writer assumes the reader is a trained skeptic grounded in real-world logic and with a personality structured on thinking in dependently and never taking authority's word for anything.
In Romance, the writer assumes the reader yearns for romance in her life, has seen it happen to others, expects it, wants to find a way to achieve it, and knows beyond doubt that finding Romance will solve most of the irksome problems of her life.
In science fiction romance the reader is looking for an argument to prove Love Conquers All. "Show me!" is the attitude of the scientist looking to define Romance.
Science fiction is not escapist literature. It is literature for those who want to reshape their reality not escape from it.
Show your reader how to create Romance, define and identify Souls, and understand the disciplines of the HEA, and you have cross-connected the two genres.
To do this, the Science Fiction Romance writer has to create an understanding of the nature of Reality (actual, real, everyday reality -- e.g. the Headlines from which we rip our stories).
The writer does not have to create a correct understanding of Reality, but does have to identify and define the precise parameters of the Soul and HEA hypotheses in the World the writer is building. This defines the edges, the shape of that world, and thus defines what choices the Characters have before them.
In other words, the Soul and HEA hypothesis the writer chooses generates the plot, and integrates that plot with the theme.
THEME: Souls Are Real
THEME: Life has a purpose; each individual is rewarded for achieving that purpose.
The HEA is a reward for a Soul achieving a purpose. How is the purpose assigned, by whom, why, and how is that purpose made possible to achieve -- and what choices does a Soul have, and when does the Soul make that choice (before or after birth?)
THEME: Rebirth does not have to involve reincarnation
THEME: The HEA is equivalent to retirement on a cushy pension or Veteran's Benefits.
In a previous post, we discussed crafting the Soul Mate of the Kickass Heroine:
https://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2018/07/theme-character-integration-part-13.html
We examined the nature of character, what people call "strong character" -- we all know when we meet a "strong" person, but sometimes we don't really know why we think that person is "strong."
So we looked deeply at the concept of character, trying to find the way to telegraph to a reader that this Character (this artificial person who runs through your story) is a Strong Character.
We created one (of hundreds of possible) idea of what the concept "character" might be in real life, and explored some fictional uses for the concept.
Character, we puzzled out, might be defined as the mechanism that connects Soul and Body.
Character is not soul. Character is not body.
Soul is the non-material spirit we feel is our Self. Body is the purely animal carcass that Spirit inhabits. The Kabbalah indicates the Soul enters our manifest reality through the dimension of Time. So we have questions that generate themes: what is Time, what is Soul, what is a human body, what is character?
Humans can be more animal than spirit, or more spirit than animal -- or a nice, firm, buffered, flexible-but-unbreakable balance.
Character is the style, manner and method by which a Soul inhabits a Body.
A "Strong Character" is one where the Soul tames and domesticates the Body, making friends with the animal spirit the way a good dog trainer tames a dog.
For those into Tarot, consider the STRENGTH CARD.
That's why character (real life people), and Character (fictional people) are so complex. We are composed of two variables and the relationship between them -- all 3 factors are nothing but pure energy.
THEME: the real world is continuous.
THEME: the real world is discontinuous.
Take the attributes of the "real world" your readers live in -- 3 spatial dimensions + time.
Over the last hundred years or so, theories of the structure of Space-Time have gone from "The Space-Time Continuum" to a model in which space, time, matter and energy are discontinuous -- e.g. Quantized.
The quantized model of reality raises a lot of questions and allows for a wide range of themes for Science Fiction Romance, a science that depends entirely on the reality of the Soul (since we write about the search for Soul Mates).
Science has been grappling with the issues of where a soul hypothesis could fit into modern physics and psychology -- life after death, ghosts, out of body experiences, precognition, prophecy -- some considerable research funding goes to projects searching for the how and why of the human sense of Self.
The Fantasy genres have been digging deep into the science behind fantasy -- why does the human brain fantasize?
Each answer to these questions generates a fertile master theme for a series of Science Fiction Romance novels.
But in 2018, this article appeared
http://cengor.com/science/the-soul-fits-into-quantum-mechanics-according-to-physicis-tutrt-vytrfyt-hgfyt.html
-----quote-----
Belief in the soul is scientific, according to Stapp. Here the word “soul” is used to describe a consciousness or personality which is independent of the brain or the rest of the human body. This consciousness transcends the physical body and does indeed survive death. In his paper, “Compatibility of Contemporary Physical Theory With Personality Survival,” he wrote: “Strong doubts about personality survival based solely on the belief that postmortem survival is incompatible with the laws of physics are unfounded.”
Stapp noted of his own concepts: “There has been no hint in my previous descriptions (or conception) of this orthodox quantum mechanics of any notion of personality survival.”
------end quote---
This article is about "life after death" which, if proven even provisionally, could generate many wonderful Themes about the nature of life before life (i.e. the Soul choosing a Body and a Birth Time generating challenges of certain kinds are certain ages.)
As we have noted in the Astrology Just For Writers series,
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2010/03/pausing-for-you-to-catch-up-with-me_30.html
"Romance" is a condition which happens during certain kinds of Neptune transits. This means that when you are born determines what age you will be when you experience Romance, and it also determines if there might be future encounters with Romance (opportunities for infidelity or second marriages after widowhood). Astrology can not reveal when you'll die -- the solar system goes right along spinning even after you die, and surely spun steadily before you were born.
But Romance happens at Neptune challenges. Those exact transits can also generate monumental (soap opera style) life-failures, stupid choices, vast mistakes, drug-dependency or addiction, and/or complete changes in your life (job, residence, marriage, children, religious affiliation). Neptune dissolves reality -and after the transit (often a year or more of melt-down) life reforms around new parameters.
Paranormal Romance deals with Life After Death - but Life Before Death is as yet largely unexplored.
If Time is quantized, perhaps the Soul is actually discontinuous, too? Or its presence in the body may be discontinuous (theory is that the soul leaves the body during sleep),
Perhaps Souls have "energy levels" akin to those of electrons and other particles?
Perhaps different Souls are composed of different Soul Particles?
The same article, Page 2
http://cengor.com/science/the-soul-fits-into-quantum-mechanics-according-to-physicis-tutrt-vytrfyt-hgfyt.html/2
gives us an animated tutorial on the double-slit experiment which seems to demonstrate the importance of INDIVIDUAL CHOICE and OBSERVATION.
That is the rudimentary level of the Kabbalistic emphasis on the importance of human choice in determining the outcome of any situation. The HEA is the archetypal case in point -- what choices guarantee an HEA? Is belief in it enough to generate it?
In reality and fantasy, in science fiction or science fiction romance, the reader is looking for a Character to become, to inhabit like their Soul inhabits their Body.
That is the experience of the "good read" we all search for - to walk in someone else's moccasins, to work on their problems thus strengthening our ability to solve our own.
When it comes to finding a Soul Mate, we grope our way to an understanding of who we are by trying to understand what "who" means. Fiction gives us hypotheses to entertain, possibilities to explore, and theories to test in real life.
Are the brain and mind two separate things? Does that question even make sense?
–––––quote--------
The quantum explanation of how the mind and brain can be separate or different, yet connected by the laws of physics “is a welcome revelation,” wrote Stapp. “It solves a problem that has plagued both science and philosophy for centuries—the imagined science-mandated need either to equate mind with brain, or to make the brain dynamically independent of the mind.”
-------end quote)
THEME: The brain is the animal human. The mind is the soul human.
In a strong character or Character, brain and mind are so "strongly" connected, harmonized, and balanced, attuned and functioning that the person moves through the world leaving a spreading wake of peace.
Such a Strong Character has many internal conflicts but resolves them with targeted and well orchestrated actions.
THEME: A Kickass Heroine can not be a Strong Character because she solves problems by kicking ass.
THEME: Monkey sex illustrates weakness of Character because it satisfies only the Body not the Soul.
Think about it a little and you will find dozens of themes that have not yet been explored deeply in Science Fiction Romance, many of which could convince atheists that the Soul is real.
Jacqueline Lichtenberg
http://jacquelinelichtenberg.com
Sunday, August 05, 2018
Cheating Democracy: One Man 70,000 "Votes".
Big Brothers are watching you, and not listening to you. They are swamping your voice, spoofing your voice.
The Trichordist tells a telling story about a "tens-of-thousands-strong" online protest over copyright reform. A rally was organized. Four people --four!!-- showed up, and all of those four people appeared to be counter-protesters who were in favor of copyright reform. The Trichordist wonders what happened to the tens of thousands of anti-copyright enthusiasts. Perhaps they never existed.
Perhaps they were a few individuals who had bought (or who had bought for them) "Full Toolkit" $529 subscriptions to the service that bombards members of parliament (MEPs) or congresspersons or other representatives of the people with up to 75,000 personalized, automated emails.
For an account of how stealthy American and non-human actors meddle in EU politics and legislation, read this guest post translated from the German:
https://thetrichordist.com/2018/08/03/anatomy-of-a-political-hack-guest-post-volker-rieck/
Few in the media speak of Canadian meddling in elections and legislation around the world and in the USA, but apparently Canada meddles. A lot.
One wonders, if technology can write up to 75,000 letters of protest to newspaper editors or to politicians and parliamentary voters with a click, (repeatedly) could this be done with/for book reviews?
Amazon probably has an algorithm for (preventing) that. The Atlantic has an interesting discussion between writers of the pros and cons of the Zon.
https://www.theatlantic.com/letters/archive/2018/08/letters-the-authors-who-love-amazon/566444/
Also from Germany, guardedly good news for rights holders doing business in Germany, as many authors do... if their works are translated. Daniel Hoppe, blogging for the law firm Preu Bohlig and Partner explains that the German Federal Court of Justice has judged that a right holder (who prevails in court, as in the "Dead Island - Riptide" case) must receive reasonable compensation for actual damage, and this must be paid by the actual infringer.
Long link.
Enforcing copyrights anywhere can be expensive. Whether it is EUR 860.00 for a German lawyer's warning letter, or $800 for expedited copyright registration in the USA (so a copyright owner who needs registration in order to sue and infringer can beat the 3-year statute of limitations to sue at all), copyright enforcement does not favor the individual.
Finally, a long-time Antipodean pen pal, Dr. Bob Rich, is promoting his new book. I'm giving him a shout-out for his blog.
https://wp.me/p3Xihq-1iQ
I especially like the quote from Rich McLean, "Just because we are all doomed does not mean that we can't be nice to one another."
All the best,
Rowena Cherry
The Trichordist tells a telling story about a "tens-of-thousands-strong" online protest over copyright reform. A rally was organized. Four people --four!!-- showed up, and all of those four people appeared to be counter-protesters who were in favor of copyright reform. The Trichordist wonders what happened to the tens of thousands of anti-copyright enthusiasts. Perhaps they never existed.
Perhaps they were a few individuals who had bought (or who had bought for them) "Full Toolkit" $529 subscriptions to the service that bombards members of parliament (MEPs) or congresspersons or other representatives of the people with up to 75,000 personalized, automated emails.
For an account of how stealthy American and non-human actors meddle in EU politics and legislation, read this guest post translated from the German:
https://thetrichordist.com/2018/08/03/anatomy-of-a-political-hack-guest-post-volker-rieck/
Few in the media speak of Canadian meddling in elections and legislation around the world and in the USA, but apparently Canada meddles. A lot.
One wonders, if technology can write up to 75,000 letters of protest to newspaper editors or to politicians and parliamentary voters with a click, (repeatedly) could this be done with/for book reviews?
Amazon probably has an algorithm for (preventing) that. The Atlantic has an interesting discussion between writers of the pros and cons of the Zon.
https://www.theatlantic.com/letters/archive/2018/08/letters-the-authors-who-love-amazon/566444/
Also from Germany, guardedly good news for rights holders doing business in Germany, as many authors do... if their works are translated. Daniel Hoppe, blogging for the law firm Preu Bohlig and Partner explains that the German Federal Court of Justice has judged that a right holder (who prevails in court, as in the "Dead Island - Riptide" case) must receive reasonable compensation for actual damage, and this must be paid by the actual infringer.
Long link.
Enforcing copyrights anywhere can be expensive. Whether it is EUR 860.00 for a German lawyer's warning letter, or $800 for expedited copyright registration in the USA (so a copyright owner who needs registration in order to sue and infringer can beat the 3-year statute of limitations to sue at all), copyright enforcement does not favor the individual.
Finally, a long-time Antipodean pen pal, Dr. Bob Rich, is promoting his new book. I'm giving him a shout-out for his blog.
https://wp.me/p3Xihq-1iQ
I especially like the quote from Rich McLean, "Just because we are all doomed does not mean that we can't be nice to one another."
All the best,
Rowena Cherry
Thursday, August 02, 2018
Replicators on the Horizon
Right here in Annapolis, a 3-D printer at the local Home Depot has been used to create a prosthetic limb for a five-year-old boy born without a hand. You can read the story and watch a video of the new hand in action here:
Prosthetic from 3-D PrinterThe maker, John Longo, a staff member at the store, has produced and donated about 120 of such devices over the past year and a half. One cool feature of the system is that new limbs can be printed from the same design in larger sizes as the boy grows.
Could 3-D printers be precursors of the replicators in the Star Trek universe? Currently, a wide variety of objects can be made from a generic material, spools of plastic filament. The versatility and usefulness of the technology has proven itself in many fields; simple replacement organs such as bladders and external ears have already been transplanted into patients. Presumably, replicators, on starships and elsewhere, create items from a supply of undifferentiated, cheap mass (like those plastic filaments), not out of thin air. The basic concept could evolve from the principles behind 3-D printers. Long before the imagined era of Starfleet and the Federation, those machines might become advanced and versatile enough to make almost any product needed in everyday life, as well as in specialized fields such as medicine and industry.
What about food? While we wouldn't expect that to be crafted out of plastic (I hope!), maybe a nutritionally balanced supply of goop could be shaped and flavored to simulate almost anything the consumer would want to eat. Could replicated food someday feed the world's hungry people? To a great extent, maybe, but considering the strong resistance to GMO crops by some factions, a movement might develop to reject such "fake" food.
Of course, even in the utopian future of a genie-magic level of technology, replicated products would have costs. The energy has to come from somewhere, and the raw material, although cheap, wouldn't be free. Moreover, well-off people wouldn't be satisfied with only replicated consumer goods. Doubtless foods made from fresh ingredients would taste better, and individually crafted items would become status symbols. Still, mass-manufactured products from some device analogous to the replicator would have profound effects on the global economy. Imagine living in a world where abundance, not scarcity, becomes the default assumption.
Welcome to the future!
Margaret L. Carter
Carter's CryptTuesday, July 31, 2018
Theme-Character Integration Part 13 Soul Mate Of The Kickass Heroine
Theme-Character Integration
Part 13
Soul Mate Of The Kickass Heroine
by
Jacqueline Lichtenberg
Previous parts of Theme-Character Integration Series are indexed here:
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2014/07/index-to-theme-character-integration.html
We discussed the nature of Theme and how to identify it early in the posts about Theme.
We discussed how to create a theme, how to state a theme in a usable format, and how to integrate theme into all the other basic storytelling skills a professional writer must master.
But we've not yet identified exactly "what" Character is.
We all assume we know what character means -- but writers can't make the assumptions they want to artistically lull a reader into making or the writer will produce fiction that screams amateur at every editor.
You can't write a Romance in any sub-genre without exploring at least 2 Characters to the depths of their Souls. You can write porn by staying on the surface of Identity, skating quickly around the essential ingredients in a Happily Ever After ending (the HEA).
All you have to do to write steamy-sexy books (not novels, mind you, just a story long enough to bind into a book) is take a male Action Novel, break it into scenes, count the pages in the fight-combat scenes, and replace the fight-combat scenes with sex scenes. I've read a lot of novels using that ploy. No Characters Allowed.
You can't have a Relationship-driven plot without a Relationship -- which requires at least two Characters.
Do you know "what" a Character "is?"
You can probably wing it, fake it until you make it, in most Romance fields because the Characters are all human.
But in Alien Romance, one of the main plot driving Characters is not human, and is making decisions based on biology and the culture that biology forces the Character to live.
If you don't know what a human Character is - how can you artificially create an Alien Character, especially one destined to Soul Mate to a human?
You not only need to know what Character is, but what Soul is, and where "Destiny" (karma etc) fit into your THEME.
As discussed in Theme-Plot Integration series...
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2013/05/index-to-theme-plot-integration.html
...what happens to change the situation depends entirely on the THEME you are showcasing in this particular volume (which might or might not be part of a Series).
It all starts with THEME -- and theme generates the Characters who will Conflict to generate the Plot.
Some writers start by consciously sketching Character traits -- for others this just kills the need to write the story. Sometimes the writer just doesn't need to know.
The most famous advice from major Science Fiction writers, such as Robert A. Heinlein, is "Just tell the story." And, "Just tell a whopping good story."
You don't have to know, consciously, what you are saying. Twenty years later (other famous writers have revealed) you might discover what you said is not at all what you thought you were saying.
Writing is a dangerous profession, as it can reveal far more of the private you than you want known.
The need to write and make public a particular Story bespeaks your own character (small c, the real-world human you are.)
Readers recognize character within your fictional Characters because, whether they know it consciously or not, readers also have character.
So we all know what character is, and by extension what Character is. Why discuss it?
We discuss it because fictional Characters are constructed to illustrate your Theme for this volume, this story, this segment of a series.
If you plot to illustrate one theme, but the Characters in the Relationship do not illustrate that same theme, you might sell the novel, but regrets about that will haunt you into changing your byline.
A Work that lives to go through many printings survives because it has an inner, invisible to the naked reader, cohesiveness of Theme-Character. That integration of theme and Character makes the Characters walk off the page into the reader's dreams because the Characters SAY SOMETHING just by existing.
A Character is an artificial construct that reveals some ineluctible Truth about human nature.
Gene Roddenberry wet the mats to get Spock into Star Trek - he knew he needed an Alien to showcase the abstract element of human nature that would transform a simple Wagon Train (TV Series) replica into real Science Fiction.
Most people think the science fiction in Star Trek is the phasers and transporters. It isn't. Those were invented to facilitate story telling in the TV medium. Hence they plastered on a "shuttlecraft" after several episodes - just whipped it out of nowhere, not from the Series Bible - because they had to move the plot within the minutes between commercials.
The real claim of Star Trek to being Science Fiction is the ongoing discussion of human Nature triggered and illustrated in show-don't-tell by Spock's "the same but different" plot-choices, views, and capabilities.
If you want to write Alien Romance, one of your Characters has to be a "Spock."
If your Alien is a human with funny ears, you will have Wagon Train instead of Star Trek -- you will write a simple Romance not Science Fiction Romance.
Gene Roddenberry created the Spock Character (then folded into the creation another Character, Number One, the female First Officer because Paramount would not allow a woman on the bridge giving men orders). Number One, the emotionless woman was to be GR's commentator on Emotion, while Spock was simply not human.
Gene Roddenberry often said that Kirk, Spock and McCoy represented the three aspects of himself. That's why Star Trek is not a "Mary Sue" -- and that is how you keep from writing a "Mary Sue."
To perform this factoring of yourself into fragments, setting them into a Team with Inner Conflicts and tolerance, you factor your own character into Characters.
Characters aren't real people - they are simplified and distilled people, but people none the less.
To simplify and distill real people's character, you have to know (consciously or unconsciously) what you are factoring out of what.
What are you?
Not "who" but "what" are YOU?
The answer to that question is the main tone in your writer's "Voice." We discussed Voice briefly, here:
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2011/08/source-of-expository-lump-part-2.html
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2013/12/reviews-3-by-jacqueline-lichtenberg.html
https://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2018/06/believing-in-happily-ever-after-part-8.html
The Soul Mate is a "mate" -- like left and right hands are opposite but fit together, or mirror images, or plug and socket, or the printer that works with your computer but won't work if you upgrade or change your computer. COMPATIBLE is not identical.
Your statement that answers the question "what" are you is your major theme, the identification of your Voice (Soprano, baritone, bass?)
Voice Type: Soprano, Range: B3 – G6.
Voice Type: Mezzo-Soprano, Range: G3 – A5.
Voice Type: Contralto, Range: E3 – F5.
Voice Type: Countertenor, Range: G3 – C6.
Voice Type: Tenor, Range: C3 – B4.
Voice Type: Baritone, Range: G2 – G4.
Voice Type: Bass, Range: D2 – E4.
What's My Voice Type? - What Are The Different Singing Voice Types
http://choirly.com/whats-my-voice-type/
Writers' voice comes in similar divisions.
It is a "characteristic" that reveals one component of your character.
Character (real and fictional) is a composite of many things. Theme is a lens through which you run Character to select out the specific attributes that the story will reveal and explain. Or you can do it by selecting a Character and looking at the life-arc of that Character to find the spot where the Character's Theme first surfaces as a Lesson.
Character, as the old saying goes, is built by adversity.
Novels are about adversity overcome and put behind -- so the Characters sail on into an HEA.
Like voices, writers have a "range" of themes to talk about, and there are themes they can't talk about, as there are songs certain singers can't sing.
Finding your Voice is not just finding your theme - but finding what you can say about that topic, about the nature of the reality your reader lives in.
"What are you?" can not be answered by, "I am a writer."
In this search for the Soul Mate of the Kickass Heroine we are looking for how to create a Theme that generates a Character and then split and/or recombine the components of that Character into people who can benefit from living a particular Plot (Kickass Heroine Finds Her Soul Mate).
The range of themes that fit (artistically) within the Kickass Heroine Finds Her Soul Mate plot-arc is virtually unlimited, so you have only to sing the song in your voice range to make it originally, specific, and memorable.
Writing is a Performing Art, so you must
"What" are you is defined by how (in what pattern, at what Voice Range) the components of your character are connected.
Character is defined by the connections between components, much more than the nature of the components themselves. All humans have the same inner components -- but those components come in varying sizes, shapes, prominence, and versatility of connectivity.
So let's take a Theme and find an answer to "What Are You?" that creates a Soul Mate suitable for a Kickass Heroine.
THEME: character is measured by the connection between Soul and Body. Strong Characters have the Soul fully occupying and in charge of the Body.
PLOT: The Soul Makes Friends With The Body, resolving Inner Conflict so HEA is inevitable.
This THEME-PLOT combination makes a lot of assumptions about the nature of Reality that readers don't normally make, therefore it is serious fodder for Science type Fiction.
As we noted in a previous entry some years ago, scientific studies show that when a female overpowers or conquers or wins against a male, the male's testosterone (aggression driver) level goes down.
Here are 3 discussions of testosterone:
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2016/11/depiction-part-19-depicting-married.html
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2016/11/depiction-part-21-depicting-alien.html
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2017/09/depiction-part-32-depicting-brain-to.html
Pay special attention to Part 19 of the Depiction series - Depicting the Married Hunk With Children (that is the HEA personified.)
As in most cases in reality, where a little is good, a lot is not better. We need our men to be aggressive enough to protect our children, but not so aggressive they take out drunken anger on us.
"Mating" in physical terms means that the constant and continuous presence of the female (sex several times a week with the SAME female) keeps the male at a comfortable and functional level of aggressiveness. He feels good, and she benefits from having a guy around the house.
"Mating" in spiritual terms means that the two souls become one -- or theme might be that Souls come in halves, and don't work well singularly. Like the magnetic monopole - or maybe an axel with only one wheel - a person who is single is going to be hampered in some way.
"Marriage" is the process of bringing that Soul-Merging process to the physical level.
Thinking in terms of "Voice" again, consider a male and a female voice merging in a duet. The resulting sound as they hit notes in a chord may originate in two different sets of vocal chords, but the SOUND that impresses on the recording medium will not be that easily factored back to individual sounds. They merge into one (assuming both are on key).
In the Real World, we seldom see marriages this perfect. Most couples hit it on a few subjects and just bicker about the other subjects.
The rarity of harmony makes this image of a functioning marriage and how to achieve it a marketable story.
But to sell that story, you need a theory of "what" a human is, and then a theory of how that physical balance between dominant female and submissive male might work. You don't want the male's testosterone to go too low - but must not let it run amok, either.
Rip an idea from the headlines. Earlier this year, the media jumped on President Trump for calling immigrants "animals." Then it turned out the media had artfully altered the sound byte clip -- he really did say they are animals, but the "they" referred to was not immigrants. He referred specifically to MS13 Gang Members -- because that particular international gang of drug smugglers are famous for ugly murders, dismembering humans while alive, and a long list of atrocities they brag about and are proud of.
The quote referred to all MS13 Gang Members -- but was specifically about the atrocities not a political affiliation or the misdemeanor of crossing a border without permission. Not all the Gang members are involved in the atrocity business. And many have been recruited from locals who are not immigrants at all.
The general, common American reaction to calling any humans "animals" is a savage rejection of the person doing the labeling. Objectifying other humans is the first step in exterminating them. In WWII, US solders -- ordinary folks, not professional warriors, but accountants and roofers and train conductors, had to call their enemy some derogatory name to survive spiritually. Normal people don't kill other people.
To kill, ordinary humans must de-classify a person into a thing. Otherwise, they would stay their hand from the blow. Just can't do it.
Knowing that, the American public rose up against President Trump when they thought he was calling all immigrants animals, and were still revolted when the correction filtered out. Most people never heard the correction.
But just think back on those weeks of uproar over "They are just animals."
It bespeaks a THEME: "What" you are (human or animal) depends on your behavior.
THEME: it is possible for a human to revert to a feral form, becoming just an animal.
Is that something the human IS -- an animal -- or a temporary condition he might fall into?
Is humanity determined by the physical primate body? Or is it an attribute solely of Soul? Or is it the nature of the connection, contact, signal-strength, between body and soul?
THEME: A human that has become an animal has lost contact with his Soul.
If Character is the connectivity between Soul and Body, then a human with almost no contact with their Soul can be viewed as an animal without objectifying for the purpose of exterminating without guilt.
A human capable of committing such atrocities (you can Google up a list if imagination fails), is functioning purely as a primate animal. Without the firm grip of the Soul on the basic primate body, a human being will behave as any other primate would.
Study Chimps. And other primates. Males have been known to eat their female's newborn babies.
What prevents humans from doing that? Nothing. But we don't. Why? Soul.
That is a theme -- human self-control or values are a product of the welding of Soul to Body. Left to itself, the body will behave like any other animal.
Body and Soul are two separate things, but exist in this reality as a fully merged whole.
Or maybe you can Build your World such that all humans have a degree of connection (a degree of character) between body and soul. Maybe in some future that connectivity may become measurable, or maybe a chip-implant will "correct" miscommunications between body and soul.
Maybe Aliens will come along who have a system or method of "developing character" or repairing the connection between body and soul. Maybe that's the secret to beating death?
Death has been defined as the Soul leaving the Body. What if that were not possible? Zombies? Vampires?
But among your readers, you will have people with varying Soul-Body Connections, some Souls not being compatible with the Body (as some printers are not compatible with your computer). Or if compatible, maybe they need an adaptor to plug in.
If it is true that being whipped and bested by a female reduces a male's testosterone level, the kickass heroine is out of luck. No man will mate with her, and if she conquers one, the husband he turns into won't be the kickass hero she so yearns for.
So what mechanism (again this is Theme-Worldbuilding practice) ...
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2014/04/index-to-theme-worldbuilding.html
... could regulate male testosterone levels in a home where the Kickass Heroine commands all. That's what "kickass" means -- can not be dominated and therefore is always in command.
"Regulate" does not mean "suppress" or "eliminate." It means add or subtract as the situation requires.
Perhaps the secret is that the Kickass Heroine's mate has to have a free-flowing, wide-open connection to his Soul, so that the Heroine's mate does not over-react to his inability to dominate her.
Maybe the Relationship settles down to him not feeling any testosterone driven urge to dominate? Maybe she, likewise, doesn't need to dominate him, or kick his ass.
How could that situation possibly be, or possibly lead to an enduring HEA?
Perhaps each of the two individuals (might be human female and Alien male) has a maximized Soul-Body connection, attuned and optimized.
If humans can revert to feral-animal style living -- earn the appellation "animal" from other humans -- by a lack of Soul-Body integration, then it follows that a very non-animal behavior will be evident in people with a strong, wide-open, freely flowing, wide-bandwidth connection between Soul and Body.
After the tussle of Soul vs Body, if theSoul wins the Body's loyalty and friendship, the person's behavior won't ever revert to "animal" level.
So if the kickass heroine has kicked enough ass to meet her own soul and embrace it, become a whole, integrated person, with very stable emotional responses, sensitive but indomitable, her Mate will recognize that she does not have to be dominated in order to behave well.
She will recognize that this matured kickass hero has full integrated with his Soul, and does not need his ass kicked. His behavior will not revert to animal level.
At that point, both these individuals will have evolved to reach a level they are Relating Soul-to-Soul, not body to body, not animal to animal.
When the Souls are married, they create a Unity that functions smoothly in the world -- and the world does not respond to their actions in the same way it responds to animals.
They are not animals. They have become Soul Mates.
At first, they are both answering "What Are You?" with a profession or species, or perhaps social station in life. At the end, they are both answering, "A Body hosting a Soul." "I'm a person."
How they get there is the Story all Romance readers yearn for.
Jacqueline Lichtenberg
http://jacquelinelichtenberg.com
Saturday, July 28, 2018
The Increasing Cost Of Copyright
The Copyright Office plans to increase the cost of copyright registration by an average of 41%.
How do you feel about that? If you have registered your own copyrights in the last 5 years, The Copyright Alliance would like your anonymous feedback before August 17th, to help them craft a written response to the Copyright Office that accurately represents the views of American creators.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZPJ23ZC
The deadline for the anonymous survey is August 17th, 2018.
Karyn A. Temple, blogging on the Library of Congress site, explains the thinking behind the new fee increases.
https://blogs.loc.gov/copyright/2018/05/copyright-office-proposes-new-fee-model/
One can comment on her blog. One can comment officially here:
https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=COLC-2018-0005-0002
The deadline for public comments on the regulations.gov site has been extended until September 21st, 2018
All the best,
Rowena Cherry
How do you feel about that? If you have registered your own copyrights in the last 5 years, The Copyright Alliance would like your anonymous feedback before August 17th, to help them craft a written response to the Copyright Office that accurately represents the views of American creators.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZPJ23ZC
The deadline for the anonymous survey is August 17th, 2018.
Karyn A. Temple, blogging on the Library of Congress site, explains the thinking behind the new fee increases.
https://blogs.loc.gov/copyright/2018/05/copyright-office-proposes-new-fee-model/
One can comment on her blog. One can comment officially here:
https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=COLC-2018-0005-0002
The deadline for public comments on the regulations.gov site has been extended until September 21st, 2018
All the best,
Rowena Cherry
Thursday, July 26, 2018
Reboots and Remakes
You've probably heard about the projected "reboot" of BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER. I'd call it a "remake" instead, since the intent seems to be to start the series over with Buffy in high school, but in a 21st-century setting and played by a black actress. Judging from the few online comments I've read, I'm not the only fan whose first reaction to this proposal was, "Why?" A remake isn't likely to surpass the excellence of the original. While I'd be thrilled with a return to the Buffyverse, a far better approach (as has been suggested by others) would be a "next generation" series, spun off from the original story with new characters. If we want to see another black Slayer, introduce a new one instead of calling her Buffy. Because the series finale created hundreds of Slayers throughout the world in place of a single Chosen One, the potential exists for a rich variety of stories, taking the mythos in a different direction from the comic-book continuation that followed the end of the TV series.
I've come across speculations about remakes of CASABLANCA and GONE WITH THE WIND. In the former case, a resounding "Good grief, why?!" seems the most appropriate response. The original is as nearly perfect as humanly possible; tinkering with the plot and characters to produce a new version could only go downhill. As for GONE WITH THE WIND, the only thing "wrong" with the classic movie is that, even at its great length, many details from the book had to be omitted, including two of Scarlett's three children. A miniseries instead of a feature film could remedy those omissions, but could it ever be as good as the existing movie otherwise? Furthermore, present-day technology doesn't allow the resurrection of Clark Gable to play Rhett, and the role wouldn't be the same without him. (When the sequel, SCARLETT, appeared on TV, I had a very difficult time accepting Timothy Dalton as Rhett.)
One remake that I thought worked well was the prime-time DARK SHADOWS with Ben Cross as Barnabas. The production values, naturally, were superior to those of the vintage soap opera, and the story moved along more briskly. It also focused on the plot thread of greatest interest to fans, the arrival and possible redemption of Barnabas. It was disappointing that the series didn't last long.
The new STAR TREK films qualify as a true "reboot," an alternate-universe iteration of the original setting and characters. Although I'm lukewarm toward this movie sequence, at least it began with a believable SF rationale for the new version.
The futuristic anime series NEON GENESIS EVANGELION may hold some kind of record for remakes, reboots, and alternate-universe story lines produced by the original creators. The plot of the series was condensed into a movie version. Another movie expanded upon the confusing ending of the TV series. Several different manga (graphic novel) variants exist, featuring the characters in different settings and situations from the one established in the original.
The most pointless remake I've ever heard of was the filming of PSYCHO with not only the same script as Alfred Hitchcock's adaptation but shot almost frame-by-frame identically to the earlier version. Couldn't they have made a brand new adaptation, returning to Robert Bloch's novel for a fresh take on the story?
In general, remaking films based on books is a different matter. If it wasn't done "right" the first time, a fresh attempt could be worthwhile. GONE WITH THE WIND as it stands adheres as closely to the novel as can reasonably be expected of a feature film. Lots of other book-to-film transformations, though, haven't been done "right" and could benefit from another try. (My concept of a "good" film adaptation means one that follows the book as closely as the film medium allows. When I watch a movie based on a novel, I want to see the novel brought to life, not some director's personal "vision.") No perfect adaptation of DRACULA has ever been filmed. The BBC TV miniseries with Louis Jourdain comes closest. Coppola's so-called "definitive" DRACULA, however, does include more of the book's characters and plot points than any other, including the Louis Jourdain version. Unfortunately, Coppola adds a love story between the Count and Mina that has no basis in the book. If he wanted to do that, he should have adapted Fred Saberhagen's excellent reinterpretation of the story, THE DRACULA TAPE. In one of my favorite series, the Narnia books, PRINCE CASPIAN has suffered most in the adaptations filmed so far. The BBC version, aside from its dated special effects, renders the book with more fidelity and respect than the dazzling feature film; even the former, however, leaves out an important sequence toward the end that's also omitted from the big-screen movie.
What movies or TV series would you like to see remade? What do you think should never be remade?
Margaret L. Carter
Carter's CryptTuesday, July 24, 2018
Reviews 37 - Ilona Andrews Magic Shifts
Reviews 37
Magic Shifts
byIlona Andrews
Magic Shifts
byIlona Andrews
The Reviews series has not been indexed yet. And I have messed up the numbering, resulting in two posts numbered 34. I'm not planning to fix that, as I think this is the only duplicate.
The first Reviews 34 is:
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2017/11/reviews-34-implausible-made-real-by.html
The second Reviews 34 is:
https://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2018/05/reviews-34-by-jacqueline-lichtenberg.html
Today we again raise the topic of what, exactly, is Paranormal Romance?
In fact, it would be good to ponder the abstract problem of what Romance really is.
The best way to figure out where you, the writer, stands on these two questions is to read-read-read. Read reams of non-fiction, yes, but loads and loads of fiction outside your target genre.
It is painful, I know, but as you did in High School and College, read things you don't enjoy. Yes, you must read for enjoyment because enjoyment is your stock in trade, what you have to sell, and if you don't have any enjoyment, you can't sell any.
You must have an overflowing reservoir of enjoyment in your heart. Therefore, read Ilona Andrews (all titles). Pay special attention to the Kate Daniels novels. If you read them already, just because they are best sellers - read them again as a set.
At the same time, to convey that enjoyment in your heart to others, to purvey that enjoyment you have collected over years, you must understand more about story structure than your reader does. You must make the structure of your story as invisible to your readers as the great writers you've been reading make their story structure invisible to you.
Therefore, today we take up a relationship-driven Action-Romance-Paranormal by a husband/wife collaborating team. There are a few like that working in the field today, but the Ilona Andrews byline is the best example at my fingertips right now.
The collaboration is seamless -- there is no jarring shift from one writer's style to the other. It is a blended style, probably done somewhat the way Jean Lorrah and I collaborate, with every word gone over by both.
They have mastered the trick of "pacing" -- the narrative moves smoothly from cerebral to action scenes.
They have SHOW DON'T TELL down pat. The Characters do not tell you what they are feeling (and the novels replete with conflicting feelings). Even if you have not read the previous novels, you know what these people are feeling.
The two main Characters, a retiring Alpha pair from a shapeshifter Pack, are not yet married, but yes they are very married, oh, very very married.
This is a Couple novel -- an after-the-Romance novel, which does ask the question, "Can this couple ever get to Happily Ever After?"
The answer seems to be Yes, but maybe not "ever-after" -- as there are still problems to be solved. They are now living in typical suburbia, adjacent to acres of wild forrest to run in, with houses on the block inhabited by other shapeshifters who have left the Pack to follow the Alpha Couple out of loyalty or other personal necessity.
Yes, I recommend the previous novels in this series, and yes, I have read them. If Shapeshifter novels are your passion, you must know all your readers will have a familiarity with these works.
But the Kate Daniels universe has another, vastly interesting, quirk. Here is not a choice between magic and technology, not a World Bridge to cross to go from where Magic works to where Technology works. Here, Magic washes over the Technology based normal world you know, and disables all our devices and gadgets. Civilization adjusts, and we see our world in semi-ruins but life goes on, with Magic working sometimes and Technology working other times.
The shifts can be dangerous.
Meanwhile, Magical creatures rampage and must be stopped.
Plenty of monster hunts, and battles, and plenty of mysterious puzzles to solve. The latter gives this the flavor of a Mystery/Detective series while the puzzles themselves work a lot like science fiction.
So, just don't miss reading Ilona Andrews titles. It is a trustworthy,, go-to byline.
Jacqueline Lichtenberg
http://jacqquelinelichtenberg.com
Sunday, July 22, 2018
Expensive Mistakes
Not all art is in the public domain, even if it is in a public place. even if an image-licensing service can license the right to use a specific photographer's photograph of that art. One might still, additionally, need a license from the original artist.
The United States Postal Service made such an expensive error, and will have to pay $3,554,946.95 plus interest to a sculptor.
Initially, a USPS employee mistook a view of a modern sculpture inspired by Lady Liberty for the Ellis Island original. The latter is in the public domain. The former is the intellectual property of the living sculptor. Possibly, the USPS could have settled for $5,000 when they first discovered their mistake.
In a Washington Post article from 2013, author Lisa Rein quotes the lawsuit.
"Defendants, through the USPS, determined that it was in their financial best interest to continue to infringe upon Davidson's rights, as the costs to discontinue the infringing activity exceeded the marginal cost of royalties...."
They calculated wrong. Way wrong. Legal blogger Jesse M. Brody for the law firm Manatt Phelps and Phillips LLP suggests that this may turn out to be one of the most expensive copyright mistakes ever.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=382f2fb0-40d7-46a1-bf28-5abef7caa891&utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&utm_medium=html+email+-+body+-+general+section&utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2018-07-20&utm_term=
It would appear that the costliest part was a 5% running royalty on the 3.24% of the stamps that were bought by stamp collectors, and represented unadulterated profit for the USPS.
An article by Timothy B. Lee for Ars Technica shows the two faces of the Statute of Liberty: the fierce-faced original on Ellis Island, and the troubled-looking homage in Las Vegas.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/07/post-office-owes-3-5m-for-using-wrong-statue-of-liberty-on-a-stamp/
Presumably, this costly lesson in copyright infringement affects us all. We'll probably all pay more for stamps,
forever.
Now comes General Motors, with the argument that Joe Public should not be expected to research the history of every public building (especially if that building is covered in graffiti) before taking a photograph, or filming something else where the graffiti is in the background.
The case of Faulkner v General Motors Company is discussed by author Alan Feuer for the New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/17/arts/design/general-motors-graffiti-artist-copyright.html
It raises some interesting issues about the use of photographs and films of public buildings and art in (and on) public places.
For artists, the copyright alliance has a timely article on how to copyright your paintings.
https://copyrightalliance.org/ca_faq_post/copyright-my-paintings/
For artists who wish to license certain rights to a work, but not to relinquish their copyright in the work, the very generous and courteous people of ARTREPRENEUR publish a template agreement, free, on condition that the beneficiaries of this template give them written credit.
Find the template here:
https://artrepreneur.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Artist-licensing-agreement.pdf
Explicit credit: https://artrepreneur.wpengine.com/
All the best,
Rowena Cherry
The United States Postal Service made such an expensive error, and will have to pay $3,554,946.95 plus interest to a sculptor.
Initially, a USPS employee mistook a view of a modern sculpture inspired by Lady Liberty for the Ellis Island original. The latter is in the public domain. The former is the intellectual property of the living sculptor. Possibly, the USPS could have settled for $5,000 when they first discovered their mistake.
In a Washington Post article from 2013, author Lisa Rein quotes the lawsuit.
"Defendants, through the USPS, determined that it was in their financial best interest to continue to infringe upon Davidson's rights, as the costs to discontinue the infringing activity exceeded the marginal cost of royalties...."
They calculated wrong. Way wrong. Legal blogger Jesse M. Brody for the law firm Manatt Phelps and Phillips LLP suggests that this may turn out to be one of the most expensive copyright mistakes ever.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=382f2fb0-40d7-46a1-bf28-5abef7caa891&utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&utm_medium=html+email+-+body+-+general+section&utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2018-07-20&utm_term=
It would appear that the costliest part was a 5% running royalty on the 3.24% of the stamps that were bought by stamp collectors, and represented unadulterated profit for the USPS.
An article by Timothy B. Lee for Ars Technica shows the two faces of the Statute of Liberty: the fierce-faced original on Ellis Island, and the troubled-looking homage in Las Vegas.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/07/post-office-owes-3-5m-for-using-wrong-statue-of-liberty-on-a-stamp/
Presumably, this costly lesson in copyright infringement affects us all. We'll probably all pay more for stamps,
forever.
Now comes General Motors, with the argument that Joe Public should not be expected to research the history of every public building (especially if that building is covered in graffiti) before taking a photograph, or filming something else where the graffiti is in the background.
The case of Faulkner v General Motors Company is discussed by author Alan Feuer for the New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/17/arts/design/general-motors-graffiti-artist-copyright.html
It raises some interesting issues about the use of photographs and films of public buildings and art in (and on) public places.
For artists, the copyright alliance has a timely article on how to copyright your paintings.
https://copyrightalliance.org/ca_faq_post/copyright-my-paintings/
For artists who wish to license certain rights to a work, but not to relinquish their copyright in the work, the very generous and courteous people of ARTREPRENEUR publish a template agreement, free, on condition that the beneficiaries of this template give them written credit.
Find the template here:
https://artrepreneur.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Artist-licensing-agreement.pdf
Explicit credit: https://artrepreneur.wpengine.com/
All the best,
Rowena Cherry
Thursday, July 19, 2018
Monsters in the Modern World
A recent question on Quora asked how well vampires would be able to survive in the modern world. My reaction was along the line of "better than ever." In DRACULA, Bram Stoker envisions how the Count uses "nineteenth-century up-to-date" conveniences to move to the modern, technologically advanced environment of England from his "ruined castle in a forgotten land" (as Van Helsing describes it). Many urban fantasy novels imagine how vampires and other traditional "monsters" might fit into the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.
To begin with, a contemporary vampire who wants to relocate can buy a plane ticket instead of having to endure a lengthy ocean voyage, with the risks of exposure in being confined to a limited space for days or weeks with a small group of oblivious human companions. An even more fundamental consideration is that, in contrast to past times and places when tight-knit communities were suspicious of strangers and people with eccentric habits, nowadays in any first-world country a vampire could blend in as just one of many representatives of diverse ethnic groups and lifestyles. For much of European and American history, failure to attend church would be seen as peculiar or downright suspicious; nowadays that behavior wouldn't raise an eyebrow. If he or she has a severe reaction to sunlight (like the undead in movies and many modern novels, although not in nineteenth-century fiction or most folklore) or simply prefers a nocturnal existence, stores and businesses with extended hours are plentiful in any decent-sized city. The Internet, of course, makes it easy to obtain most products and services without leaving home. If the vampire needs to earn money, numerous night-shift jobs are available. Never being seen eating could be attributed to allergies or some other dietary restriction. ("I'm on a liquid protein regimen.") What about nourishment? Blood banks (with, presumably, bribeable employees who could supply newly expired blood) offer an obvious source. Also, it wouldn't be hard to find potential donors with romantic notions about vampires, who would happily give blood under the impression that the alleged vampire is simply playing a role.
Computers and the Internet, in my opinion, would make transition from one lifetime to the next easier rather than harder. A competent hacker can create a new identity with supporting data planted on all the relevant websites. In the TV series FOREVER KNIGHT, one vampire makes a career of performing that very service. The issue of possible exposure by old photographs was raised on Quora, a problem that I believe is much exaggerated. What would you think if you saw a century-old photo that closely resembled a contemporary acquaintance? Would you instantly jump to the conclusion that the person must be immortal? No, most likely you would think, "What an amazing family resemblance." My husband's brother looks remarkably like a picture we have of their father in late middle age, and nobody wonders whether my brother-in-law is really his father under a new identity. :)
Werewolves could also benefit from modern conveniences. With rapid transit, on full-moon nights a werewolf could quickly travel to an isolated region where he or she could roam and hunt animal prey. If he or she suffers from the affliction of being unable to control the change or behave rationally when transformed, an electronic lock on a timer could keep the werewolf safely confined in a reinforced room during the critical period—no need to involve a fallible human helper. In case of a craving for raw meat, any big city has butcher shops where fresh meat of all kinds can be bought, then consumed in the privacy of the home. Or maybe a discerning werewolf would order exotic cuts online (venison? buffalo?). Interesting side note: Poul Anderson wrote a couple of stories about werewolves who stay rational in wolf form but need moonlight to transform. They carry flashlights that simulate moonlight, so that they can change shape by shining the artificial moonlight on themselves.
Would the Internet and social media make contact with friendly extraterrestrials easier or harder to adjust to? The news of their arrival, with visual recordings, would be transmitted around the world instantly. On the other hand, given the ease of faking photos and videos, would much of the public think it's a hoax at first? How long would it take for governments and mainstream news media to convince most of their constituents that the landing really happened? Considering we still have believers in a flat Earth and disbelievers in the moon landings, some people might never accept the existence of aliens.
Vampires on FOREVER KNIGHT worried about photographs, because they could alter human memories by hypnosis, but memory erasure didn't stick if the victims had physical evidence to reinforce their awareness of the truth. One might think social media would pose a serious danger to the anonymity of vampires, werewolves, and other monsters. Again, I think the risk isn't that high, because audiences have solid reasons to be cynical about visual "proof." Anybody who isn't already predisposed to believe in the supernatural would probably dismiss pictures or videos as staged, photoshopped, or both. If vampires WANTED to come out in public (as in the Sookie Stackhouse series and its TV adaptation, TRUE BLOOD), they might have as much trouble getting the world to believe in them, at first, as visiting aliens would.
Margaret L. Carter
Carter's CryptTuesday, July 17, 2018
Dialogue Part 15 Writing Inner Dialogue of Soul Mates
Dialogue
Part 15
Part 15
Writing Inner Dialogue of Soul Mates
by
Jacqueline Lichtenberg
Previous parts of the Dialogue series are indexed here:
http://aliendjinnromances.blogspot.com/2012/10/dialogue-parts-1-4-listed.html
We visualize the wedding moment as divine intervention to make life Happily Ever After - it is a supernatural moment.
A wedding is the beginning of a new life. It changes everything including your self-image.
Usually, all the Romance happens before the wedding -- the wedding scene may be the final scene of the novel.
Sometimes, the story is about what happens if the anticipated inflection point of getting married somehow aborts -- one or the other gets cold feet, one or the other is accidentally killed on the way to the wedding, one or the other is put in the hospital by an accident at the verge of death, or one of them is murdered or deliberately attacked and left hospitalized. Possibly, an ex or some jealous stalker emerges or a love-child situation is revealed during the ceremony.
Drama (Pluto is Drama) abounds at the peak pivotal moments of life.
The bigger the pivot the more spectacular and singular the drama.
For example, true Soul Mates rammed together by circumstances may experience Hate At First Sight. Most Romance readers do understand this dynamic -- that the intensity of the aversion can be the sign that these two are Soul Mates.
Not just lovers, or two people having an affair or a one-night-stand -- but true Soul Mates.
Months ago, there was an article posted online at mindbodygreen.com that pointed out what all Romance readers know.
---------quote---------
Many years ago, I was sitting with a couple in my office, marveling about what a "perfect fit" they were: They were both into healthy living, rescue dogs, and hiking. They didn’t argue, their facial expressions were kind, and their nonverbal signals showed they cared.
Despite this, they were talking about ending their relationship. They couldn’t describe what was wrong, but both felt the relationship was empty. I followed the usual process: We looked for places of trouble, which were few, and explored the good parts of their relationship, which were many. However, it was as if a spark between them was never lit. In the end, they felt it was best to part amicably, which they did.
That session was followed by an hour with another couple who didn’t stop arguing from the moment they walked in the door. They had been waiting all week to "tell on the other," i.e., talk about the agreements each had broken and the far-reaching arguments about washing the dishes or sex, all with a plethora of eye-rolling and grimacing. However, the passion between them was palpable; under the power struggle, there was a lot of interest and passion. We worked hard for months, and they were eventually able to break their destructive loop and spend more time living with the pleasure they found in each other.
These two stories point to one of the most important truths my 35 years of working with couples has shown me. Though we know many of the qualities and skills that make a great relationship—most of which can be learned—there is no rule book for what makes two people work. Sometimes people just know their relationships are over; other times, even though it’s hard, they are willing to do the work to make it good again.
There are times you MUST leave ...
--------end quote-------
Read the article at:
https://www.mindbodygreen.com/articles/how-to-know-when-its-time-to-walk-away-from-your-marriage\
It is full of great novel ideas about when to admit the "Happily Ever After" so anticipated at the wedding is not going to happen, and what to do about it.
As a writer, look inside yourself and then examine the people closest to you -- you will find an abundance of "internal conflict" which is the raw material of such drama, the kind of deep realization that your HEA didn't happen -- and won't. Many, in the grip of this realization or those suppressing the realization of this truth leap directly from "I don't have it" to "It does not exist."
What evidence would you accept that the HEA is real, possible, and you missed your chance?
Soul Mates are two individual, and very different, people who are two halves of a whole -- they become one at the wedding. That's what "wedding" means - it is a word used in wine making for mixing two wines, so you can't take them apart again.
But once married, building a life together -- jobs, commutes, buying cars, choosing a house or condo or apartment, furnishing it, having children (or deciding not to), thousands of individual decisions suddenly become joint projects.
The two become one.
What is going on inside one person splashes over into the inside of the other.
The more emotionally heated the anger, love, passion, offense, indignation, jealousy, resentment, and demands that YOU (not me) change behavior -- the more likely the two actually do belong together.
Their inner conflicts have crashed into each other, and shards of hard-headed rocks are flying everywhere. Bystanders can be sliced to the bone as collateral damage.
True Soul Mates rarely meet in tranquility and sail blissfully on into a calm life.
Depicting a pair of Soul Mates on their shake-down cruise is a serious challenge for a Romance writer who wants to explore passionate sex and carefree joys because after the honeymoon is over, the conflicts become riptides pulling the couple apart.
The inner dialogue - the unspoken thoughts - of such a pair differ as male and female differ, but reflect each other. Each seeks justice which means having their own expectations fulfilled. Or, with some, the inner dialogue is about fulfilling the expectations of the Other and having that fulfillment acknowledged in a specific way.
For example, the 2018 culture is grappling with the conflicts between the traditional image of "Being A Man" and a new self-image for healthy masculinity that has not yet crystalized.
It will take 4 generations for such attitudes to be "natural" to men and women, and the transition will be confusing.
Fiction writers can explore these options with inner dialogue -- and how what one person in the couple is thinking one thing, but forcing themselves to do another.
Last Spring a huge misunderstanding of a University of Texas program erupted around the idea that a University was officially regarding masculinity as a mental illness. (What A Theme!)
But that's not exactly what was really going on.
---- quote -----
The University of Texas is facing ridicule after a new program called “MasculinUT” was announced in a way that insinuated it was treating masculinity as a mental health crisis.. The university has attempted to explain the program as simply an effort to “bring more men to the table to address interpersonal violence, sexual assault and other issues,” but the reality is that UT is still promoting a facetious connection between masculinity and assault and violence.
When the program was originally announced, its stated goal was to help male UT students “take control over their gender identity and develop a healthy sense of masculinity.” as PJ Media reported:
The program is predicated on a critique of so-called “restrictive masculinity.” Men, the program argues, suffer when they are told to “act like a man” or when they are encouraged to fulfill traditional gender roles, such as being “successful” or “the breadwinner.”
Though you might enjoy “taking care of people” or being “active,” MasculinUT warns that many of these attributes are actually dangerous, claiming that “traditional ideas of masculinity place men into rigid (or restrictive) boxes [which]… prevent them from developing their emotional maturity.”
“If you are a male student at UT reading this right now, we hope that learning about this helps you not to feel guilty about having participated in these definitions of masculinity, and instead feel empowered to break the cycle!” the program offers.
As mentioned above, the program is also run by UT’s Counseling and Mental Health Center “[l]ike other UT programs related to sexual assault and interpersonal violence.” And the website’s stated “project goals and guiding principles” still focus on the idea that certain types of masculine emotions and traits are negative and connected to sexual assault and violence.
For example, they are making an effort to “[p]romote an ethic of care for men and masculine-identified individuals who cannot escape expectations of masculinity,” “‘[e]ncourage a wider range of acceptable emotions,” and “[d]ecrease excessive competition and increase empathy.”
----end quote-------
Read the article at:
https://www.redstate.com/sarah-rumpf/2018/04/30/new-program-university-texas-conflates-masculinity-sexual-assault/
There is certainly enough material regarding the female self-image, and the idea that a woman "should be" this and never that (whatever the this or that involved in the current culture's demand might be) for writers to depict a woman's inner dialogue as bemoaning the requirement.
All of this raises the science question which makes the essence of Science Fiction Romance -- "what exactly is gender?"
And do Souls come in genders? Kabbalah says yes, Souls are locked in a single, specific gender lifetime to lifetime.
Science Fiction plays with the theory that Souls can reincarnate as human even if their prior lifetime was non-human. And the idea of a male reincarnating as a female is common. Most Science Fiction TV shows (including Star Trek) played with the idea of a male identity being trapped in a female body (or vice versa).
If you want to write a novel involving Soul transfers, be sure to do a state-of-the-art search and read up on what has been done -- there is much more to say on this topic!
Consider if reversing gender for a day would change the Character's inner dialogue. Is the inner dialogue a product of gender or of mis-match between Soul and body's gender, or merely of societal expectations?
What exactly is gender?
The question is relevant to the idea of "Mates" -- as we are currently challenging the age-old assumption that Mates must be a pair of opposite gendered people.
Does gender come in opposite? Is it this OR that but nothing in between?
Is gender optional? Are Souls neuter?
All of these questions must be answered only if the answers differ from your reader's everyday world. These questions frame the world you are building around your story.
Consider the example from the marriage counsellor noted above, where the couple arrived arguing the moment they walked in the door. If they exchanged genders, would they still be Soul Mates? Would they also exchange arguments and the fighting just go on without missing a beat?
Is the reason they are arguing simply that one is trapped in a gender whose expectations he/she can not meet? (Men to be the bread winner; women to bear and raise children).
Would expectations have to be adjusted in such a situation, to result in an HEA? What hammering drama would have to pound their heads together to create such an adjustment?
Find answers to those questions and cast them as simple statements -- and you've created a THEME. Telling the story may be harder than anything you've ever done.
Jacqueline Lichtenberg
http://jacquelinelichtenberg.com
Sunday, July 15, 2018
"Stifling Creativity" AKA The Profitable Ingenuity Of The Lawless
Applying bricks-and-mortar laws to the internet would "stifle creativity" and prevent "the sharing" of "information" and generally "end the internet as we know and love it". Such is the gist of the so-far-successful opponents of the controversial copyright law that was just rejected by the EU Parliament.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44712475
"Critics said the laws would stifle creativity..."
Allow this author to translate. The "creativity" that would be stifled" by a reform of European copyright laws is not the genius of authorship, musicianship, cinematic film making, or the artistry of a photographer or painter. No, it is the profitable ingenuity of thieves.
"Sharing"..."information", is usually a matter of monetizing stolen creations of others. Pirate sites don't publish and distribute helpful advice or uncommon knowledge. Their "information" is more likely to be illegal copies of movies, games, works of fiction, music. And, they don't "share" like one neighbor does to another over the garden fence. They broadcast (like tossing seeds in a wide arc over a ploughed --or plowed-- field), usually for the purpose of payment from advertisers.
Legal blogger Gill Grassie for the law firm Brodies LLP examines what is legally or logistically unacceptable about the draconian Article 13 of the EU proposal.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=06f30201-e4c4-4756-8035-a7c35b486bf2
To wit, bigger platforms might have been obliged to prevent copyright infringing work from being uploaded by users. Additionally, websites might have had to pay a license fee for displaying snippets of text snagged
(my term) from published articles.
By contrast, and from the sharp end, here's a fine video analysis of piracy by film maker Ellen Seidler of who profits from piracy, and how, and why. (It's from 2012, but still relevant.).
https://thetrichordist.com/2012/04/03/who-profits-from-piracy/
If lawmakers were to intellectually follow the money, they might do a better job of protecting creators. Perhaps the wrong Congressional and legislative bodies are looking at the problem... and of course, too many lawmakers are campaign-funded and lobbied by entities that find piracy profitable.
Aatif Sulleyman for the Trusted Reviews site examines the reasons produced in a 2018 survey on why Britons steal online.
https://www.trustedreviews.com/news/piracy-reasons-copyright-infringement-3501618
It seems to boil down to the love of a freebie. It's free, and it's convenient. Or at least, that is the popular perception.
(But, all this "free" stuff is ruining musicians' livelihoods. A musician debunks the idea of touring and T-shirts as an adequate substitute for record sales, and points out that concert performances provide zero income for songwriters: https://thetrichordist.com/2018/07/11/a-timely-repost-the-economics-of-mid-tier-touring-from-someone-who-has-done-it-for-34-years/ )
Aatif Sulleyman wrote this, about watermarking.
https://www.trustedreviews.com/news/piracy-future-covert-watermarking-free-stream-3483149
This author never expected a search for "remove watermarks on copyrighted content" to produce any search results at all. Wrong!
https://www.google.com/search?q=remove+watermarks+on+copyrighted+content&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab
Colour me shocked.
On the other hand, the same socially responsible purveyors of useful information will also assist bricks-and-mortar perps.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-ab&ei=LmpLW8KjIOrCjwT41IDwAg&q=How+to+crack+a+safe&oq=How+to+crack+a+safe&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.213654.229082.0.238308.58.33.0.0.0.0.112.2566.31j1.32.0..2..0...1.1.64.psy-ab..38.20.1528...33i22i29i30k1j0i273k1j0i131k1j0i67k1.0.sypCEQvBLpE
I should probably now clear my cookies... and so, dear reader, should you.
The host of this blog (Blogspot) puts cookies on visitors' devices, and conveniently infers that visitors agree to deer-tick-like cookies piling on and burrowing in. Most sites to which this article has linked make the same inference.
Although "Cookie Consent" is the new panic according to legal blogger Eduardo Usteran, blogging for Hogan Lovells, blogs and websites have been obliged to let visitors know about their no-opt-out cookies
since an EU directive in 2009.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9192c959-3e9f-4288-aef1-5e4c8740b0cd&utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&utm_medium=html+email+-+body+-+general+section&utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2018-07-05&utm_term=
All the best,
Rowena Cherry
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44712475
"Critics said the laws would stifle creativity..."
Allow this author to translate. The "creativity" that would be stifled" by a reform of European copyright laws is not the genius of authorship, musicianship, cinematic film making, or the artistry of a photographer or painter. No, it is the profitable ingenuity of thieves.
"Sharing"..."information", is usually a matter of monetizing stolen creations of others. Pirate sites don't publish and distribute helpful advice or uncommon knowledge. Their "information" is more likely to be illegal copies of movies, games, works of fiction, music. And, they don't "share" like one neighbor does to another over the garden fence. They broadcast (like tossing seeds in a wide arc over a ploughed --or plowed-- field), usually for the purpose of payment from advertisers.
Legal blogger Gill Grassie for the law firm Brodies LLP examines what is legally or logistically unacceptable about the draconian Article 13 of the EU proposal.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=06f30201-e4c4-4756-8035-a7c35b486bf2
To wit, bigger platforms might have been obliged to prevent copyright infringing work from being uploaded by users. Additionally, websites might have had to pay a license fee for displaying snippets of text snagged
(my term) from published articles.
By contrast, and from the sharp end, here's a fine video analysis of piracy by film maker Ellen Seidler of who profits from piracy, and how, and why. (It's from 2012, but still relevant.).
https://thetrichordist.com/2012/04/03/who-profits-from-piracy/
If lawmakers were to intellectually follow the money, they might do a better job of protecting creators. Perhaps the wrong Congressional and legislative bodies are looking at the problem... and of course, too many lawmakers are campaign-funded and lobbied by entities that find piracy profitable.
Aatif Sulleyman for the Trusted Reviews site examines the reasons produced in a 2018 survey on why Britons steal online.
https://www.trustedreviews.com/news/piracy-reasons-copyright-infringement-3501618
It seems to boil down to the love of a freebie. It's free, and it's convenient. Or at least, that is the popular perception.
(But, all this "free" stuff is ruining musicians' livelihoods. A musician debunks the idea of touring and T-shirts as an adequate substitute for record sales, and points out that concert performances provide zero income for songwriters: https://thetrichordist.com/2018/07/11/a-timely-repost-the-economics-of-mid-tier-touring-from-someone-who-has-done-it-for-34-years/ )
Aatif Sulleyman wrote this, about watermarking.
https://www.trustedreviews.com/news/piracy-future-covert-watermarking-free-stream-3483149
This author never expected a search for "remove watermarks on copyrighted content" to produce any search results at all. Wrong!
https://www.google.com/search?q=remove+watermarks+on+copyrighted+content&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab
Colour me shocked.
On the other hand, the same socially responsible purveyors of useful information will also assist bricks-and-mortar perps.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-ab&ei=LmpLW8KjIOrCjwT41IDwAg&q=How+to+crack+a+safe&oq=How+to+crack+a+safe&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.213654.229082.0.238308.58.33.0.0.0.0.112.2566.31j1.32.0..2..0...1.1.64.psy-ab..38.20.1528...33i22i29i30k1j0i273k1j0i131k1j0i67k1.0.sypCEQvBLpE
I should probably now clear my cookies... and so, dear reader, should you.
The host of this blog (Blogspot) puts cookies on visitors' devices, and conveniently infers that visitors agree to deer-tick-like cookies piling on and burrowing in. Most sites to which this article has linked make the same inference.
Although "Cookie Consent" is the new panic according to legal blogger Eduardo Usteran, blogging for Hogan Lovells, blogs and websites have been obliged to let visitors know about their no-opt-out cookies
since an EU directive in 2009.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9192c959-3e9f-4288-aef1-5e4c8740b0cd&utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&utm_medium=html+email+-+body+-+general+section&utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2018-07-05&utm_term=
All the best,
Rowena Cherry
Thursday, July 12, 2018
Sword and Sorceress
I'm thrilled to announce that I've had a story accepted for this fall's SWORD AND SORCERESS 33 anthology, published by the Marion Zimmer Bradley estate and edited by Elisabeth Waters and Deborah J. Ross. I submit a story most years but don't often make the final cut, so it's exciting to win a place in the book. As you may guess from the title even if you haven't read any of the previous volumes, the series comprises "sword and sorcery" fantasy with female protagonists. Here are the contents of the forthcoming anthology, which we're encouraged to share:
SWORD AND SORCERESS 33 TABLE OF CONTENTS
WRESTLING THE OCEAN by Pauline J. Alama
HAUNTED BOOK NOOK by Margaret L. Carter
THE HOOD AND THE WOOD by Lorie Calkins
SINGING TO STONE by Catherine Mintz
THE RIVER LADY’S PALE HANDS by M. P. Ericson
LIN’S HOARD by Deirdre M. Murphy
THE CITADEL IN THE ICE by Dave Smeds
ALL IN A NAME by Jessie D. Eaker
DEATH EVERLASTING by Jonathan Shipley
BALANCING ACT by Marella Sands
FIRST ACT OF SAINT BASTARD by T. R. North
THE FALLEN MAN by Deborah J. Ross
A FAMILIAR’S PREDICAMENT by Jane Lindskold
THE SECRET ARMY by Jennifer Linnea
COMING HOME TO ROOST by L. S. Patton
FROM THE MOUTHS OF SERPENTS by Evey Brett
MAGIC WORDS by Alisa Cohen
CHARMING by Melissa Mead
My tale features a ghost in the library of a magical university, with a bit of humor.
SWORD AND SORCERESS has had a complicated publishing history, perhaps symptomatic of the shifting tides of publishing in the past few decades. It began as a long-running series of mass market paperbacks from DAW Books. After DAW and SWORD AND SORCERESS parted ways following MZB's death, a lapse of a few years was followed by several volumes in trade paperback from a small press. Finally, up to the present, the annual trade paperbacks have been published by the Marion Zimmer Bradley Literary Works Trust itself.
A few years ago, the Trust also resumed producing Darkover anthologies, a project that had been dormant for a long time. Now they're publishing a new one each May, in trade paperback rather than the former mass market format.
Most of the works released by the Trust are also available as e-books. Moreover, many stories from the anthologies, plus some other short pieces by anthology contributors, are sold on Amazon as stand-alone e-books. You can find them here. (If you scroll down far enough, you'll find a selection of my short stories.):
MZB Works in KindleAnother anthology series from the Bradley estate, now on its fourth volume, is called LACE AND BLADE. It contains swashbuckling tales of adventure with touches of magic and romance. I would characterize the first volume as "perfectly targeted to Zorro fans," although subsequent anthologies have gradually widened their scope.
You can find out about the various books and series at the link below. Also, the Trust produces some audiobooks and CDs. In short, they offer a prime example of taking advantage of the full range of available media and formats to reach fans:
Marion Zimmer Bradley Literary WorksMargaret L. Carter
Carter's Crypt
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
