Currently, copyright only protects works that are created by humans.

Legal blogger Benni Amato, on the IP Blitz blogsite of the Intellectual Property law firm Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani uses the Q and A format to discuss (in very small font) the two burning questions of the moment, namely "Can You Copyright AI Art?" and "Does AI Art Constitute Copyright Infringement?"

https://www.ip-blitz.com/2023/03/ai-art-and-copyright-in-the-unites-states/#page=1

He is particularly interesting on the use of AI to create art fakes, or "vicarious copyright infringement".

Finally, for me, for today, legal blogger Daniel Lumm for Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough LLP details an experiment that he carried out using ChatGPT.

ChatGPT is the bot that can pass the bar (to become a lawyer), some medical exam or other, and some business school exams.

Imagine, and this is my own imagining, if HAL 9000 of 2001 A Space Odyssey were to replace, say, Dr. Fauci!

Back to Mr. Lumm's experiment and analysis of the issues to consider with regard to OpenAI and ChatGPT, which include ownership, responsibility, confidentiality, privacy, security, and more.

https://www.nelsonmullins.com/idea_exchange/insights/chatgpt-on-what-terms-is-the-future-so-bright

To riff off the good people of LQDN while taking legality out of the equation, just because it is there, and one can use it, maybe does not mean that one should (use it).