If you've been following my entries on the blog, you know I'm examining the rising phenomenon of "social networking" as part of the way "publishing" is changing under the impact of the Web and e-book. Those changes are re-shaping Genre, and allowing for the explosion of Cross Genre novels, mixed Genre novels, and mashed universes where characters by one author meet characters from another author's series.
Here is a scattered sample of some of my posts here on social networking.
and the attempt by "marketers" to use the social networks to promote their products, many of them bewildered why it doesn't "work."
Twitter has rapidly become one of my favorite social networks because I keep discovering people, and finding links to things I want to know about but had no clue that I was interested in (and thus would not have googled for the subject).
Here is a conversational exchange with a person I follow, who follows me so that I can hear what they're saying and they can hear what I'm saying.
scripteach I greatly enjoyed #TheHurtLocker, but thought the direction rocked, not the script. It felt like it drifted off the rails in 3rd Act.
jlichtenberg @scripteach "It felt like it drifted off the rails" doesn't help a writer learn not to drift off their own rails Say why and how to fix pls
scripteach @jlichtenberg doesn't help a writer learn not to drift off their own rails Say why & how to fix pls In less than 140 characters is hard!
scripteach @JLichtenberg I'll try to blog about #TheHurtLocker soon. For now, the protag's unauthorized mission into city & return home felt false.
jlichtenberg @scripteach Good point about "unauthorized mission" motivation failing. How do you spot that in your own work? #scriptchat
scripteach RT @JLichtenberg: How do you spot in your own work? #scriptchat Beware of what YOU want protag to do v. what the character should want to do
jlichtenberg @scripteach Ur nutshell " #scriptchat Beware of what YOU want protag to do v. what the character should want to do" ROCKS!!! @susansizemore
I flagged Susan Sizemore on that because she and I exchanged tweets about staying with POV character. She tweeted that she'd made herself a problem by following too many minor characters, and that made me think (but not tweet) the complex relationship between following minor character's pov and using minor characters to reveal major character's motivations.
And @scripteach was talking really about a MOTIVATION problem in this very prominent film.
The #scriptchat hashtag can be searched on to produce all the tweets by everyone on twitter who inserts #scriptchat into a tweet -- regardless of whether you're following them or not.
People (ppl) discussing The Hurt Locker use the hashtag #TheHurtLocker and see each other's posts.
Anyone searching on a hashtag may (not will; may) see your tweet if you include that tag.
And they may, not will, follow you to see what else you say.
Having conversational exchanges like this is one the most rewarding and instructive functions of social networking.
Now of course I should write one of my humongous posts on what @scripteach has said and what it means and how you can use it.
For the time being, though, memorize and think about
"Beware of what YOU want protag to do v. what the character should want to do"
I'm not good at nutshells. It would probably take me 2500 words to sketch a means of employing that bit of wisdom.
If you want to research it - check out the writing error technically termed "contrived."
I also found via twitter that the SHOOTING SCRIPT of this film has been released in print with additional pages of illustrations etc. at 160 pages --
In addition to the complete shooting script, this Newmarket Shooting Script® Book includes an exclusive introduction by Kathyrn Bigelow, a 16-page color photo section, production notes, storyboards, and complete cast and crew credits.
And here's more about it on Amazon:
The Hurt Locker: The Shooting Script (Newmarket Shooting Script)
This is indeed a strange new world where to get a story out printed on paper it must first become a major motion picture winning awards right and left.
The alternative is to become a TV commentator.
I ReTweeted (RT) the tweet that alerted me to The Hurt Locker as a script on paper and flagged @scripteach thusly:
jlichtenberg RT @MattDentler: Some thoughts on THE HURT LOCKER screenplay (and the party last night celebrating it): http://bit.ly/baTR84 @scripteach
And @scripteach answered that he would read the script thusly:
scripteach RT @JLichtenberg: RT @MattDentler: Some thoughts on THE HURT LOCKER screenplay): http://bit.ly/baTR84 I'll read script & see what I think
That's why it's called "social networking" -- and that's why marketers can't afford to do it. At no time did the publisher of the shooting script participate in this exchange. I don't even know if they're on twitter. I didn't go out to sell a copy of the script. I was just curious how a screenwriting teacher would explain a script's hole to writing students on #scriptchat so I asked, and got a great answer, and picked up on someone else mentioning a blog about the film's success which has on it a link to the shooting script published as a book on paper.
That's a "net" and it got "worked."
Tuesday, March 02, 2010
Conversation on Twitter
Posted by Jacqueline Lichtenberg at 11:00 AM
Labels: Action, Jacqueline Lichtenberg, romance, screenwriting, Suspense, The Hurt Locker, Tuesday, Twitter
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment