Thursday, February 23, 2023

AI Sermons?

To follow up the topic of "creative" artificial intelligence programs, here are some clergy-persons' thoughts about sermons composed by chatbots:

Sermons Written by ChatGPT

Not surprisingly, the consensus from representatives of several different faith traditions is that AI-composed sermons have no "soul." This is one genre in which the personal, human element remains essential. A rabbi in New York comments, “Maybe ChatGPT is really great at appearing intelligent, but the question is, can it be empathetic? And that, right now at least, it can’t.” A pastor in Minneapolis writes about the program's attempt to compose an essay on maintaining one's mental health during the stress of the holiday season, “Although the facts are correct, there is something profound missing. . . . AI can’t understand community and inclusivity and how important those things are in building a church.”

On the other hand, New Testament scholar Todd Brewer asked ChatGPT to write a Christmas sermon based on the Nativity story in Luke's gospel, "with quotes from Karl Barth, Martin Luther, Irenaeus of Lyons, and Barack Obama." He was taken aback when the resulting composition was “better than many Christmas sermons I’ve heard over the years.” However, judging from the listed criteria, the requested product sounds more like an article than a sermon. Brewer himself, again not surprisingly, said it lacked "human warmth." Given that reservation, can the AI really be said to "understand what makes the birth of Jesus really good news"? Not to mention the unlikelihood that artificial intelligence in its present stage of development can literally "understand" anything -- raising a whole other complex question, whether intelligence can exist without consciousness.

From reports on ChatGPT from people who've tried it, I get the impression that it can produce creditable essays on factual topics, if fed enough sufficiently specific data, although they tend to be "bland." In more creative endeavors, as might be expected, the program falls short. And it wouldn't be ethical to present the program's raw output as one's original work anyway.

Since I'm a slow writer and first-draft composing is my least favorite phase of the writing process, I've often wished that a word-processing program existed that would take my detailed outline—such as those I've constructed according to the plan in Karen Wiesner's excellent FIRST DRAFT IN THIRTY DAYS—and expand it into a fleshed-out draft of a novella or novel in my own style. I could take it from there with editing and revision. While it's possible to instruct ChapGPT to create a writing sample "in the style of" a particular author, I strongly doubt that procedure would work for fiction anytime soon. So for the time being I'll just have to continue tackling the laborious stage between outlining (which I enjoy) and revising (which I don't mind, up to a point) the hard way.

Margaret L. Carter

Carter's Crypt

3 comments:

  1. This is an interesting article, especially in light of this article I just read: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/21/sci-fi-publisher-clarkesworld-halts-pitches-amid-deluge-of-ai-generated-stories?fbclid=IwAR2q4LQanWFL_Qn00PHI-RNzJccY3Ei-EA0vqWbr_1QY5TTC33s-0y0Htn4#sq_hbcercomcm Also wanted to add that First Draft in 30 Days has been reissued as First Draft Outline, the first in my 3D Fiction Fundamentals Collection. http://www.writers-exchange.com/3d-fiction-fundamentals-series/

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is an interesting article, especially because I just read this article: “Sci-fi publisher Clarkesworld halts pitches amid deluge of AI-generated stories”. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/21/sci-fi-publisher-clarkesworld-halts-pitches-amid-deluge-of-ai-generated-stories?fbclid=IwAR2q4LQanWFL_Qn00PHI-RNzJccY3Ei-EA0vqWbr_1QY5TTC33s-0y0Htn4#sq_hbcercomcm

    Also thought I’d mention that my book FIRST DRAFT IN 30 DAYS has been reissued under the new title FIRST DRAFT OUTLINE. It’s the first in my 3D Fiction Fundamentals Collection.
    http://www.writers-exchange.com/3d-fiction-fundamentals-series/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, I'd heard of that decision by Clarkesworld.

    ReplyDelete